FSi football streaming FSi football streaming
FSi football streaming FSi football streaming FSi football streaming FSi football streaming
FSi football streaming
FSi football streaming Download P2P SoftwareFSi ForumsLive Streams and Feedback



Welcome to the FSi Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

View Poll Results: Should AV be introduced for Westminster elections?
Yes 3 50.00%
No 2 33.33%
I'm happy with either system 0 0%
I don't care. I don't vote 0 0%
What's AV? 1 16.67%
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  #1  
Old 26-04-2011, 04:39 PM
Begbie's Avatar
Begbie Begbie er ikke aktiv
Chicken in Black
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
Should the Westminster voting system be changed to AV?
Do you think that AV should be introduced for Westminster elections?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-04-2011, 04:41 PM
adam_ayres1988's Avatar
adam_ayres1988 adam_ayres1988 er ikke aktiv
Friend of FSi
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,984
vCash: 80
Whilst it's not ideal (I would prefer proportional representation) it'll probably be better than the awful first past the post system we currently have in place.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-04-2011, 04:45 PM
Begbie's Avatar
Begbie Begbie er ikke aktiv
Chicken in Black
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
Quickly in there, Adam. I hadn't even time to post the poll.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-04-2011, 05:03 PM
adam_ayres1988's Avatar
adam_ayres1988 adam_ayres1988 er ikke aktiv
Friend of FSi
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,984
vCash: 80
Well my opinion needs to be heard........ and fast!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-04-2011, 05:07 PM
stenelly stenelly er ikke aktiv
Friend of FSi
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 4,290
vCash: 50593
with proportional representation it almost always ends in a hung Parliament. you also have to give seats to extremist parties IE, bmp and the like. so i would vote no. i know first past the post isn't ideal but it's served this country for a hundred + years or so. so why change what isn't broke.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-04-2011, 05:33 PM
Begbie's Avatar
Begbie Begbie er ikke aktiv
Chicken in Black
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
AV isn't PR so it's very unlikely that extremist parties will get elected. If, for example, the BNP won 40% of the votes in a constituency they would probably be elected to Parliament for that constituency. That's under the current system.

Under AV, the candidate with the lowest number of first preferences is eliminated and his/her votes are allocated to the remaining candidates based on their 2nd choice of candidate. This is repeated until a candidate has acquired more than 50% of the votes cast or there is only one candidate remaining.

It is unlikely that somebody voting for a mainstream party will choose an extremist party as their 2nd choice.

AV would provide a 'consensus' result for each constituency. I don't know if that is better or worse.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-04-2011, 05:52 PM
stenelly stenelly er ikke aktiv
Friend of FSi
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 4,290
vCash: 50593
sounds a very expensive way of voting and counting. iv been to a few counts for council votes, and noticed lots of mistakes on the count even from experienced bank tellers. the votes are checked up to 4 times before a final count. with 2nd 3rd and maybe 4th votes counting it would be a logistical nightmare to count. possibly machine counted. i also noted how many spoilt votes there was, this was with the simplest just place a x for your vote. its just not British voting for another party on a voting card.
one man one vote in my eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-04-2011, 05:54 PM
Begbie's Avatar
Begbie Begbie er ikke aktiv
Chicken in Black
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
Tell that to N. Ireland, Scotland and Wales. We've had PR for years...... and managed to get the counts done.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-04-2011, 11:21 PM
deadlywill's Avatar
deadlywill deadlywill er ikke aktiv
Aussie Champ
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: LandDownUnder
Posts: 3,286
vCash: 644980
...i would say yes. I think Anti-virus is very important to have
__________________
MUFC 1977 - death...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2011, 08:58 PM
lumberjack's Avatar
lumberjack lumberjack er ikke aktiv
Friend of FSi
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The woods
Posts: 789
vCash: 1055691
Nick Clegg has really fooked this up. By being a passive dick in government and going back on how many election pledges, people don't trust him at all.

It was a chance to change the system to get out of this 'key marginal seats' situation that we are in now.
__________________
There is always a way.......it's finding it that is the problem.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Forum SEO by Zoints
Copyright FSi - http://www.footballstreaming.info - http://www.fsicrew.info - http://www.fsiteam.info
FSi football streaming FSi football streaming