Rio Ferdinand loses privacy case against Sunday Mirror

[Greenman]

Hears and other one who can't keep him dick in hims keks and has payed for it big time.

Rio Ferdinand loses privacy case against Sunday Mirror

Manchester United defender Rio Ferdinand is a married father of three
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories

Rio story 'helped woman move on'
Ferdinand angry at 'affair' story
Press-gagged?
Football star Rio Ferdinand has lost his High Court privacy action over a story in the Sunday Mirror about an alleged affair.

The Manchester United player was seeking substantial damages from MGN Ltd for misuse of private information.

The case was over an April 2010 Sunday Mirror article in which Carly Storey gave her account of their alleged relationship in return for £16,000.

The 32-year-old defender and his wife, Rebecca, have three children.

The case hinged on whether the newspaper was justified in publishing its story because the public interest was such that its Article 10 right to freedom of expression was of a greater importance than Ferdinand's Article 8 privacy right under the Human Rights Act.

Ferdinand had branded the article - My Affair with England Captain Rio - a "gross invasion of my privacy" and said he had not seen Ms Storey for six years by the time it appeared.

MGN said it was in the public interest to run the story about Ferdinand, who replaced John Terry as England captain in February 2010 after stories about Terry's alleged affairs emerged.

The story said Ferdinand ended the alleged relationship within days of being handed the captain's armband.

'Misleading public image'
Its counsel, Gavin Millar QC, said Ferdinand was appointed England captain on the basis of being reformed and responsible. In fact, as the article said, this was not the case, he said.

He argued that the case was not really about Ferdinand's privacy but about the effect on the public image he had constructed, and was without merit.

In court, the judge said: "Overall, in my judgement, the balancing exercise favours the defendant's right of freedom of expression over the claimant's right of privacy."

Sunday Mirror editor Tina Weaver said in a statement that the paper was "very pleased" about the court's decision.

"The judge found that there was a justified public interest in reporting the off-pitch behaviour of the then England captain and discussion of his suitability for such an important and ambassadorial role representing the country.

"We are pleased the judge ruled that Mr Ferdinand had perpetuated a misleading public image and the Sunday Mirror was entitled to correct this impression.

"There has never been greater scrutiny of the media than now, and we applaud this ruling in recognising the important role a free press has to play in a democratic society," it said.

The BBC's legal correspondent Clive Coleman said the case was a "pretty significant" development in the law of privacy and the result was "good news for the tabloid press in particular".

"The tabloid press, somewhat beleaguered at moment, are going to have much more confidence in publishing this kind of story... the issue of public interest is certainly back.

"If you can argue that in relations to sports people, perhaps celebrities, actors, that they perform some sort of public role that is under scrutiny, and they are perhaps in the eyes of the newspaper article publishing being hypocritical... then yes... they will have a good defence to a privacy action," he said.