|
|
|
 |
|
Welcome to the FSi Forums forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
|
27-01-2011, 12:01 PM
|
 |
Chicken in Black
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
|
|
|
Olympic Stadium
Coincidence?
Spurs and West Ham both want to take over the Olympic Stadium after the Games.
It was pointed out to me recently that 'The New Stadium' is an anagram of 'West Ham United'.
__________________
|
|
27-01-2011, 12:13 PM
|
 |
Calm Down
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olympus Mons
Posts: 1,842
vCash: 707756
|
|
Originally Posted by Begbie
It was pointed out to me recently that 'The New Stadium' is an anagram of 'West Ham United'.
So is 'Sweat in the mud'.... more apt I think. 
__________________
FSi Prediction League 2012... Starts 14th January!!... JOIN HERE
|
|
27-01-2011, 04:02 PM
|
 |
Balls to the brewery
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: I just sat down.
Posts: 1,756
vCash: 420542
|
|
|
Also Tottenham Hotspurs is an anagram of romany nogoods.
__________________
The worst Arsenal team in 15 years just thrashed the best Spurs team in the last 50!
|
|
27-01-2011, 05:43 PM
|
 |
VIP
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not in the midlands anymore
Posts: 1,128
vCash: 5157
|
|
Originally Posted by glenman
Also Tottenham Hotspurs is an anagram of romany nogoods.
lol, brilliant!
__________________
|
|
27-01-2011, 06:35 PM
|
|
Chicken in Black
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
|
|
Originally Posted by glenman
Also Tottenham Hotspurs is an anagram of romany nogoods.
Do Tottenham Hotspurs play in the same league as Manchester Cities and Arsenil?
__________________
|
|
27-01-2011, 07:35 PM
|
 |
FSi Addict
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hillsborogh, Land of the Gods
Posts: 281
vCash: 1181
|
|
|
It's also an anagram of Phattest Homo Runt & Patent Homos Truth
|
|
10-02-2011, 08:30 AM
|
 |
Lounge Lizard
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
vCash: 1851
|
|
Looks like the Wristhammers have it!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011...lympic-stadium
I can understand West Ham wanting to keep the running track. The further you are away from the Hammers, the better they look!....  |
|
10-02-2011, 01:58 PM
|
 |
VIP
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 943
vCash: 14090459
|
|
|
Here is my 2 pence worth on this.I think spurs should have got it for these reasons.
1. spurs have said that they would spendd 400 million which would be paid for by the private sector and west ham want 100million from the public sector.I think enough public money has been spent without spending even more.
2.I could be wrong but i think spurs have a bigger fan base than west ham which woould mean they would fill the stadium.
3.Is west ham even going to stay in the premiership? where as spurs are on the up with champions league games.
Sorry to all west ham fans but just how i see it from the outside.
|
|
10-02-2011, 02:26 PM
|
 |
Aussie Champ
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: LandDownUnder
Posts: 3,286
vCash: 644980
|
|
Originally Posted by elftone1
Here is my 2 pence worth on this.I think spurs should have got it for these reasons.
1. spurs have said that they would spendd 400 million which would be paid for by the private sector and west ham want 100million from the public sector.I think enough public money has been spent without spending even more.
2.I could be wrong but i think spurs have a bigger fan base than west ham which woould mean they would fill the stadium.
3.Is west ham even going to stay in the premiership? where as spurs are on the up with champions league games.
Sorry to all west ham fans but just how i see it from the outside.
..makes sense to me elf - that's probably why they didn't choose it  |
|
10-02-2011, 03:58 PM
|
 |
Ken Aye
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,068
vCash: 2675
|
|
|
If tottenham got it then surely they would have to change their name ? Welcome to franchise football if they did.
|
|
10-02-2011, 06:36 PM
|
|
Chicken in Black
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
|
|
Originally Posted by Raff67
If tottenham got it then surely they would have to change their name ? Welcome to franchise football if they did.
Dial Square, Woolwich Arsenal, Arsenal ring any bells?
Having said that, I think West Ham should get the stadium. I don't know about its commercial viability though.
__________________
|
|
11-02-2011, 01:40 AM
|
|
Aussie Champ
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: LandDownUnder
Posts: 3,286
vCash: 644980
|
|
|
How many seats in this thing anyway?
|
|
11-02-2011, 04:36 AM
|
|
Chicken in Black
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
|
|
Originally Posted by deadlywill
How many seats in this thing anyway?
More than 150. Everybody who is still there at the end of a West Ham game gets a seat.
Running tracks around the pitch were all the rage the last time that West Ham were in Europe. I think it was the failed Hoover 'free flights' offer. 
__________________
|
|
11-02-2011, 12:24 PM
|
|
Ken Aye
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,068
vCash: 2675
|
|
|
Well West Ham won it. No need to support Stratford Hotspurs.
|
|
11-02-2011, 06:11 PM
|
 |
Friend of FSi
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Radcliffe
Posts: 1,025
vCash: 3633642
|
|
|
if you go back through tottenhams history the spuds were never classed as a london club. Possibly why they didnt get it.
__________________
MANUAL SPELL CHECKERS PLEASE EDIT
|
|
11-02-2011, 09:16 PM
|
|
Lounge Lizard
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 246
vCash: 1851
|
|
Originally Posted by manUdave
if you go back through tottenhams history the spuds were never classed as a london club. Possibly why they didnt get it.
Horseshite...
Enlighten me on that statement please! |
|
11-02-2011, 10:20 PM
|
|
Chicken in Black
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portstewart
Posts: 8,864
vCash: 2142909028
|
|
|
I don't know if Haringey was counted as part of London when Spurs were formed. It certainly is now, so they are definitely a London club.
They probably won't get the stadium as they want to re-build it without the athletics track and upgrade the Crystal Palace athletics venue as an 'Olympic legacy'. The Olympic Legacy Company is advising the government and the lord mayor that they feel West Ham's proposal benefits athletics. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not Spurs are a London club.
manUdave has been reading some factually incorrect websites created by gooners.
__________________
|
|
11-02-2011, 10:35 PM
|
 |
Guru
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 634
vCash: 73211
|
|
Originally Posted by Burdock
So is 'Sweat in the mud'.... more apt I think.
love the avatar burdock.
look at the mug on torres
priceless  
__________________
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 AM.
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright FSi - http://www.footballstreaming.info - http://www.fsicrew.info - http://www.fsiteam.info
|
|
 |
MUFC 1977 - death... 
